To understand present-day neonatal care, it is essential to examine the historical roots of cultural beliefs surrounding infancy:
- Rituals and symbolic protection: Across history, newborns were seen as highly vulnerable to supernatural harm. Practices such as swaddling, protective charms, and ritual bathing were designed not only for physical comfort but also to shield infants from perceived spiritual dangers. For example, in medieval Europe, baptism was performed soon after birth to protect the infant’s soul, while in West African traditions, rituals were performed to “introduce” the child to the community and ancestors.
- Feeding traditions: Before the advent of modern nutrition science, breastfeeding and wet-nursing were universal but culturally regulated. In elite households in ancient Rome and medieval Europe, wet nurses were employed, while in Indigenous communities, communal breastfeeding practices reinforced kinship bonds. These historical norms still influence contemporary attitudes toward breast milk, formula feeding, and shared caregiving.
- Birth and postpartum practices: Historically, childbirth and neonatal care were the domain of women within the community, midwives, mothers, and elders, rather than healthcare professionals. Cultural postpartum rituals, such as confinement periods (e.g., zuo yuezi in China, la cuarentena in Latin America), developed from the belief that mothers and infants required seclusion and protection to ensure survival and future health. These customs persist today, though increasingly adapted within modern healthcare systems.
- Colonial and modernization influences: The spread of Western biomedicine during colonial and missionary periods altered indigenous neonatal practices. Hospitals, vaccination campaigns, and hygiene initiatives often conflicted with traditional customs, creating a hybrid landscape of care. For instance, while biomedical advice encouraged sterile environments and scheduled feeding, traditional beliefs emphasized constant skin-to-skin contact and responsive feeding.
Taken together, the historical trajectory of infant care reveals a dynamic interplay between tradition, religion, community, and scientific progress. Contemporary neonatal practices are thus best understood as cultural continuities and adaptations, rather than wholesale replacements of tradition with modern medicine.